Freedom of Political Associations

Freedom of association in Europe and the United States is considered to be one of the most important human rights, with there being only a thin lineif indeed such line existsbetween curbing this freedom and crossing the boundaries of democracy. Without it, there is no democracy. A recent decision by the European Court of Human Rights indicates that this right has no universal definition. The Court unanimously confirmed the dissolution of Turkeys largest political party by referring to Turkeys historical fight for democracy. The Courts interpretation is in line with many European countries definitions of freedom of association - which reflect the very different paths these countries have taken towards democracy. In this book, freedom of association is observed from the perspectives of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States, and as a consequence, if a doctrine similar to the European historical approach is inherent in the American freedom of association. If not, what constitutes the difference between these two courts approaches and how that difference might lead to diverse conclusions.

Grimur Sigurdsson is a Supreme Court Attorney in Iceland. Grimur graduated as Cand. Juris from the University of Iceland in 2002 and with an LL.M degree from the University of Washington in 2007. Grimur has lectured at the Law Faculties of the University of Iceland and Reykjavik University and written legal articles for books and law reviews.